 |
BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 4248
Location: New York, New York, USA
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2025 12:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | How ironic, that the postwar TWIN COACHES (aka "Oddballs") that helped to replace the streetcars, disappeared roughly about the same time that the last B&QT streetcars did (late 1956)
Certainly, the Old Looks (and MACKS) lasted longer, perhaps not all that surprisingly............ |
The Twin "Oddballs" didn't even hang around to see the first "Jetsons" introduced onto the streets of Brooklyn in 1959, that's how much true "Dangerfields" of their time they were.
The Brooklyn bus routes were divided amongst different divisions: the "Brooklyn Bus Division," no doubt from old routes that were bus from the beginning, run by the old Brooklyn Bus Corporation; and "BMT Surface Division," a combo of B&QT streetcar, "trackless trolley" and bustituted routes. After the last of the second-named converted to bus service in 1960, that latter entity became the "BMT Bus Division," as based on old transfers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29756
Location: NEW JOISEY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29756
Location: NEW JOISEY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29756
Location: NEW JOISEY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 4248
Location: New York, New York, USA
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2025 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Almost resemblant of tin cans by the end, no? Sounds like a forerunner in some respects to today's "BINO's" . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29756
Location: NEW JOISEY
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2025 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
They often say, "appearances are deceiving"; IMHO, I believe that also well describes the postwar "Oddball".
To see them in on the streets, they DID appear to be a "hefty"-looking vehicle, but, it would seem that they were not all that "crash worthy".
Sure, even a "Kramden" or a "Patton" could take a pretty rough beating if an accident was severe enough, BUT, without a doubt, they were built of far "sterner stuff" than the postwar "Oddballs"........
"NYO"
["TWIN COACH"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
BusTalk Main
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
BusTalk Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
