BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

"Happy Birthday, IRT!":Influences:Philly/Chicago
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 95, 96, 97, 98  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(SEE PREVIOUS PHOTOS/LINKS)

W.B.:

Here is another excellent page you will indeed "get into"! Wink

Note, also, the unexpected influences from London's "tubes"; much here on station signage, entrance/exit designs, etc.

Much "individuality" in these historic station designs.

(Also, look closely for two Fishbowls in one 1980s photo!)

Too, interesting to note that each station utilized its own individual colored trim "accent".

www.forgottenchicago.com/features/our-historic-subway-stations/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's another interesting page......

https://cera-chicago.org/Blog/3294025

Note, here, postcard depicting a "Bluebird" running in the State Street Subway (an underground postwar "busway" was also proposed; see illustration w/ postwar "Oddballs!) Shocked

"NYO"

["CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 58
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 4243
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
Assorted "Shik-aga" photos..........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?14945 (note GRUMMAN "Bomber")

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?18574 (note old-style platform lettering)

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?14744

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?143294

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?14386

"NYO"

"Shik-aga," to my knowledge, didn't get any "Bombers" after Grumman got out of the picture and they were reconstituted as Flxible Metros.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

Correct you are.

At least, unlike our "Em-Tee-Yay", the "SZee-Tee-Yay" did not put their collective "eggs" into one "basket", and purchase hundreds of buses, which were, quite, literally, lemons.

Of course, by that late date, Fishbowls were only being built in Canada, and "Dangerfields" were, by then, totally oit of production.........

"NYO"

["48-KEDZIE"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding the State Street Subway.......

It would appear that, though the CRT didn't seek to "carbon copy" the "Eye-En-Dee" (then the newest system in "Noo Yawk") they DID seek to project a totally "moderne" image, just as the Independent did when it began service in 1932..........

"NYO"

["INDEPENDENT SUBWAY SYSTEM"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Note that this illuminated "moderne" sign on the BSS (Philly) hints at the electric station signboxes used on the original State Street Subway (such signs would have been right at home on the "Eye-En-Dee")......

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?17039

(courtesy: nyxsubway.org)

["FAIRMOUNT"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting.......

Though the "Eye-En-Dee" was indeed quite "moderne" and "flashy" compared to the older "Eye-En-Dee" and "Bee-Em-Tee", its rolling stock was quite "utilitarian" in appearance.

One cannot help but wonder if the City "ventured forth" at some point during the 1930s had designed a new Independent car, one that would better reflect the "moderne" styles of that era, as was clearly evident in the BSS's formidable, fearsome "Rocketeers".

Interesting, too, are the doors (more atkin to bus or streetcar doors)

Had the Independent had kiosks, I can easily see them as being "moderne" in design as well.......

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?49889

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["J.G. BRILL"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 58
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 4243
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
Regarding the State Street Subway.......

It would appear that, though the CRT didn't seek to "carbon copy" the "Eye-En-Dee" (then the newest system in "Noo Yawk") they DID seek to project a totally "moderne" image, just as the Independent did when it began service in 1932..........

"NYO"

["INDEPENDENT SUBWAY SYSTEM"]

Even on the tracks, built Type II, there were differences in "Shik-aga" from the "Eye-En-Dee" - how the blocks were sized in width and height (both were 30" long except on extensions on which to place the "toid rails" - and even on that there were some variances between the two cities). Of course, "toid rail" placement was way different - and unlike in "Noo Yawk," no wooden protective covers. Again, we go back to Bugs Bunny's "foist step."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 58
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 4243
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
Interesting.......

Though the "Eye-En-Dee" was indeed quite "moderne" and "flashy" compared to the older "Eye-En-Dee" and "Bee-Em-Tee", its rolling stock was quite "utilitarian" in appearance.

One cannot help but wonder if the City "ventured forth" at some point during the 1930s had designed a new Independent car, one that would better reflect the "moderne" styles of that era, as was clearly evident in the BSS's formidable, fearsome "Rocketeers".

Interesting, too, are the doors (more atkin to bus or streetcar doors)

Had the Independent had kiosks, I can easily see them as being "moderne" in design as well.......

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?49889

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["J.G. BRILL"]

There was a bit of "Bee-Ess-Ess' " regular subway cars (vs. their "Rocketeers") in the design of the "Arnines," both were conceived within the same time period. I saw pictures in 1929 editions of Electric Railway Journal of the Philly lot, and if I didn't look closely I would've thought I was seeing a photo of one of the "Eye-En-Dee" cars that inaugurated that "soivice" in "Nineteen-Toity-Too."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

I've long believed that the end sign boxes used on the now-iconic "Arnines" were "inspired" by those utilized by the "Bee-Em-Tee's" fearsome "Triplex" units.

Now, interestingly enough, none of the "Bee-Ess-Ess" cars ever were furnished with end sign boxes (these cars first arrived in 1928, four years before the "Eye-En-Dee" opened)

The "Bee-Ess-Ess" cars of the 1980s, interestingly enough (like postwar equipment from "Bah-ston- and "Shik-aga") feature small "gun slot" signboxes at car ends (recall, also, the "tubes" 1958 "K"/"MP-52" joint service cars).......

"NYO"

["SUBWAY"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Comparisons............

If you compare the original Cambridge cars from "Bah-ston", you can clearly see what inspired the later "Broadway Battleship" AB-"Standards"

Regarding the BSS cars, note that, unlike the "Battleships", featured "railroad"-style roofs...........

"NYO"

["CITY HALL-FERN ROCK"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also.....

As was the case up in "Bah-ston", a number of prewar BSS cars were revamped with modernized interiors, in the years just after the War........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?72873

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?72880 (note the streamlined "NEXT STATION" sign in the clerestory; I can easily picture these being used on the "Arnines")

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This photo dates to 1969, the same year that our long-lived, rugged "Broadway Battleships" (Standards) were retired.

Without a doubt, the interiors of non-upgraded prewar BSS cars easily would have been "right at home" on both the "Bee-Em-Tee" and the "Eye-En-Dee".......... Wink

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?48813

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This circa-1960 photo from Philly (Market-Frankford El) easily recalls the "Eye-Are-Tee" up in "da Bronx", back in the day; the buses in the bus lanes below easily could have been serving "Soiface" buses..........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?78244

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["PRT"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29743
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Note the uncanny resemblence of the "first generation" Market-Frankford cars to the INTERBOROUGH's prewar rolling stock; these cars, replaced by the BUDD "Almond Joys" in 1960/1961 predated the iconic "Lo-Vs" by several years.

The cars were built by hometown car builder "J. G. BRILL", as well as "PRESSED STEEL".

Note the small, bulkhead-mounted markers and the "El"-type headlight.....

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?150791

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?16767

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)


Last edited by NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 on Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:19 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 95, 96, 97, 98  Next
Page 96 of 98

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group