BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

BART: The "Key" Reincarnated
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> General Transportation - All Other Modes
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

(SEE PREVIOUS POST)

In 1958, electric rail rapid transit in the Bay area finally expired, seemingly for all time, only to be revived a decade later, in the form of BART......talk about a major-league turnaround....... Shocked

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?16124

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?19599

(courtesy: ncvsubway.org)

["A"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1136
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Fri Jan 31, 2025 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYO,

To me, the bridge units still looked modern and they looked like trains. The BART cars looked like giant "people movers." Even worse than the R-40 "Slants!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri Jan 31, 2025 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider wrote:
NYO,

To me, the bridge units still looked modern and they looked like trains. The BART cars looked like giant "people movers." Even worse than the R-40 "Slants!"


Cyberider:

I, also, have alweys been a HUGE fan of the original "Bridge Units"; indeed, they looked quite modern and sleek, when they entered service on the "KEY" in the late 1930s.

The original "shovel-nosed" BART cars always reminded me of those erasers where one end featured a sharp slant! Wink

The current rolling stock is about as bland and as humdrum as the newest METRO cars in DC; if not "beauty queens", the original BART cars were "interesting", in a way.......current cars are just worthy of a drawn-out "yawwwwwn". Razz

Give me a "Bridge Unit" anyday! Very Happy

"NYO"

["B SAN FRANCISCO"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1136
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Fri Jan 31, 2025 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYO:

If they had painted the original BART cars pink, we could call them "Pink Pearl" erasers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2025 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is an interesting (and quite detailed!) page on BART rolling stock, past and present.........

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_Area_Rapid_Transit_rolling_stock

Note the interior photos of the new "D" and "E" Series cars; note how the interior walls "angle in"; this reminds me of the rolling stock used on the tubes (Underground) in London.

Note, also, that straps are furnished for standees; the last new subway cars built for New York to be equipped with straps were the "R-42" BMT/IND cars of the early 1970s.

The last cars in operation to still be equipped with straps were the iconic "Redbird" IRT cars, the last of which were retired in 2003...........

"NYO"

["NYCTA"]

["BART"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2025 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ironic..........

IN 1958, the last KEY "Bridge Railway trains made their final runs; a decade later, construction was well underway for what would eventually become today's complex, far-reaching rapid transit network, BART.

In Los Angeles, the last trains on the former PE's Long Beach line disappeared in 1961; two years later, the last streetcar routes in the city were converted to buses.

After a neatly two-decade absence, electric rail transit (light rail) returned; today, Los Angeles operates both light rail and heavy rail rapid transit.

How odd (and most ironic) that electric rapid transit made a big return in both cities, only after after the once-complex systems that had served millions for decades had been destroyed.......

"NYO"

["KEY SYSTEM"]

["PACIFIC ELECTRIC"-

["BART"]

["M"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1136
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2025 4:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The private systems folded because they weren't allowed to charge enough fare to cover costs. The new quasi-governmental agencies have huge taxpayer funded budgets to build and operate expensive new systems at the taxpayer's expense, most of whom don't even use the system but, nevertheless, are paying for them. Fares, when collected, don't come close to covering costs. My opinion!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2025 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider wrote:
The private systems folded because they weren't allowed to charge enough fare to cover costs. The new quasi-governmental agencies have huge taxpayer funded budgets to build and operate expensive new systems at the taxpayer's expense, most of whom don't even use the system but, nevertheless, are paying for them. Fares, when collected, don't come close to covering costs. My opinion!


Cyberider:

You made several very valid points.

The old private systems were not the burden of taxpayers who used the rail systems either very little or not at all.

This is atkin to why, 60-odd years ago, when I was growing up, the local "indy" buses companies in my area were still using older buses that were the then "quite long in the tooth"; no government subsidies in those long-gone days, so the companies "made do" with what they had for decades.

Ditto the commuter railroads and rapid transit systems; back in the day, 50-60 year old equipment was commonplace.

Again, until fairly recently, there were no sizeable government "bailouts" for the purchasing of new rolling stock (plus, the old equipment was built in AMERICA and built to LAST!)

Indeed, it's a TOTALLY different scenario, nowadays.....

"NYO"

["AVOID TRAFFIC FUSS-RIDE THE BUS!"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2025 11:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Articulation..........

It would have been interesting had BART decided to "jump start" articulation when their original "slant nose" equipment was being designed.

Interesting, too, as the KEY's "Bridge Units" were the ONLY articulated rolling stock in use in the Bay Area; PE, of course, never experimented with articulation, although several interurbans did roster articulated equipment.

In New York, along with several experimental articulated units, the BMT rostered a number of "production model" articulated trainsets, the "D"-Type Triplex (1925) and the Multi-Section units (1936/1937); the last were retired in 1965.......

"NYO"

["BMT LINES"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2025 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BART trains serving Marin?

This is an interesting "what if" article with a number of good illustrations.

Recall, the NWP's electrics (and connecting ferryboats) served Marin until 1941.

What might have been.............

https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/How-BART-almost-connected-to-Marin-by-way-of-the-16309661.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also............

Image of the abandoned "Bridge Railway" tracks on the lower level of the Bay Bridge had survived long enough to have the old ROW incorporated into the new BART network?

Just thinking.............

"NYO"

["ba"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Came across this interesting page (there are also a few historic "KEY" photos)

"TRAFFIC ENGINEERS VS TRANSIT PATRONS"

See:

www.trainweb.org/mts/ctc/ctc03.html

["A-SAN FRANCISCO"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2025 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

See also..........

https://eastbayyesterday.com/events/what-happened-to-the-key-system/

["167"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> General Transportation - All Other Modes All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13
Page 13 of 13

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group