BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

"It's just a big, boxy, new bus...so what?"
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 58
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 4243
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
Also..........

What "Torpedos" replaced the very last of the GRUMMAN "Bombers"?

What lines ("Em-Tee-Yay" and "stoa") saw their very last "Bombers" (and when?) replaced by the "Torpedos"?

As always, appreciate all info..............

"NYO"

I'd say the 1983-84 orders . . . the 3000's and 4000's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2024 11:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

Thanks.

This is "in sync" with the most "recent" GRUMMAN photos at nycsubway.org being from that time span..............

"NYO"

["GRUMMAN"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1136
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The other predominant bus at the time was the RTS. To my eye, that bus had more appeal than the Grumman.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 11:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider wrote:
The other predominant bus at the time was the RTS. To my eye, that bus had more appeal than the Grumman.


Cyberider:

In my area of New Jersey, the RTS was simply not to be seen......ANYWHERE, well into the 1990s.

It was not until about 1997 when NJT began taking delivery of a large number of RTS (NOVA).

The RTS I liked the best were the earliest models with the slant-back; one ran as a demo for the MTA; they also operated in Queens early on (independents)

So far as Fishbowls and Flex New Looks, the last disappeared from my area about 1997/1998.

The very last Old Looks were retired in 1986 (there was only a handful left, by that time)..................

"NYO"

["HUDSON COUNTY BOULEVARD"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1136
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:


Cyberider:

In my area of New Jersey, the RTS was simply not to be seen......ANYWHERE, well into the 1990s.

It was not until about 1997 when NJT began taking delivery of a large number of RTS (NOVA).

The RTS I liked the best were the earliest models with the slant-back; one ran as a demo for the MTA; they also operated in Queens early on (independents)

So far as Fishbowls and Flex New Looks, the last disappeared from my area about 1997/1998.

The very last Old Looks were retired in 1986 (there was only a handful left, by that time)..................

"NYO"

["HUDSON COUNTY BOULEVARD"]


NYO,

I liked the slant back RTS's too but apparently the AC was sketchy in those buses, possibly due to lack of room for big enough condenser coils. RTS's were very popular in LA but not so much in Phoenix. I liked them less than what came before but they did have the "GM genes" so there was some continuity. My interest waned when GM sold out and the Detroit Diesel 2-cycle engines went away.

It is interesting, though, that some of the Old Looks stayed in service for almost 30 years. (I think some of Sun Valley's exceeded that.) By the time of the New Looks, they were down to about 25 years. And now we're at 14 or is it 12 years for the current junk buses?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider:

Baltimore's MTA also had the original "slant back" RTS; to this day, they are STILL regarded as the WORST buses ever to operate in the city.

The a/c's barely worked (if at all) and, with sealed windows (and only roof pop-up hatches for ventilation) these ill-fated buses became rolling saunas during the summer months

Drivers and riders alike LOATHED them

In fact, passengers waiting for their bus would let an RTS pass them up, so that they could ride on a Fishbowl or Flxible with WORKING a/c! Shocked Rolling Eyes

"NYO"

["5 BALTIMORE & GAY"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1136
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess that's why the slant backs didn't last long!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider wrote:
I guess that's why the slant backs didn't last long!


Cyberider:

Exactly!

Recall, the a/c-equipped Old Looks. Fishbowls, and Flex New Looks were furnished with roof-top a/c units.

These oldest Old Looks with a/c had a long duct duct running the length of the roof, with a boxy a/c unit just over the rear windows.

The later a/c-equipped Old Looks (like the Fishbowls and Flex New Looks) did not have the duct along the roof, but had a larger, more modern a/c unit over the rear windows.

Your's Truly remembers all of these now-classic buses QUITE well, from his much younger days......... Wink

"NYO"

["RIVER ROAD EXPRESS"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 58
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 4243
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's possible our MTA heard about Baltimore's negative experiences with the "slant back" RTS's (a.k.a. "Quasimodos") and waited until they were straightened out before they committed as they would - and did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B. Fishbowl wrote:
It's possible our MTA heard about Baltimore's negative experiences with the "slant back" RTS's (a.k.a. "Quasimodos") and waited until they were straightened out before they committed as they would - and did.


W.B.:

Indeed, that wopuld make sense to me, and a most valid reason for not rushing headlong into buying several hundred buses that might NOT have been all they were supposed to be.

There used to be an OUTSTANDING Baltimore transit site (now long gone) where EVERY type of bus and streetcar that once ran in Baltimore had its own page, VERY heavy on the technical detail, and a number of great photos.....sadly, it has long since disappeared. Sad


(perhaps NOT surprisingly, the Baltimore "Dangerfields" were well received!)


The RTS page went into a LOT of detail on just how downright AWFUL these buses were early on, suffocating both drivers and passengers during the hot, humid Baltimore summers.

Perhaps it is a GOOD thing that the (:Noo Yawk" MTA waited as they did; recall, though, those early "slant backs" that operated in Queens.

The (few) ex-DART RTS that ACADEMY purchased in the mid-90s were of the same ilk as those in Baltimore; to say their a/c BARELY functioned (IF at all) is to put it mildly; on the other hand, the ex-MTA RTS were great buses all around, I really enjoyed riding them on the #22 as long as they lasted!)

"NYO"

["Rapid Transit Series"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1136
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Phoenix Old Looks had the "box and duct" AC and, as I recall, they worked rather well, even in our heat. We didn't have any of the factory-equipped AC Old Looks but I think all of the Phoenix Fishbowls were factory AC.

As for the slant back RTS's, I think many of them were rebuilt with straight backs and openable windows.

Long Beach, CA was an early adopter of the RTS with slant backs. I think the SCRTD was not. Phoenix also did not have any.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider:

You are correct on the retofitting of early RTS with new a/c packages.

In "OLD LOOK TRANSIT BUSES" (Luke/Metler) there is a photo of a "SUN VALLEY" Old Look suburban (a 4509) which, interestingly enough, not only has a roof duct, but also, the more modern a/c unit at the rear.

This was (from what I gather) a "custom" job, as it was reported that the a/c was not added until 1964; the bus itself dated to 1952............

"NYO"

["GM"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1136
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYO,

I took a look at that photo. Too bad there isn't a rear shot. I'm rather certain that it wasn't one of those factory AC's put on the newer Old Looks. Wish I'd taken photos of those buses. Maybe the film and processing was too expensive for my budget then. Some of those 1952 buses made it well into the '80's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider:

Virtually all of the suburban Old Looks here in NJ (and there were hundreds!) were gone by about 1977, when the new NJDOT Flex New Looks were being delivered.

The lone exception were those running for "SOMERSET"; when they were retired in the very early 1980s, they were then the very last suburban Old Looks operating for a New Jersey carrier............

"NYO"

["SOMERSET"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29741
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's a timeless photo of a "SOMERSET" Old Look suburban working a charter; until later in the 1960s, this company was still operating at least a few ACF-BRILL C-44s (man, they were STUNNING in the "SOMERSET" paint!) Wink

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?154519

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["NEWARK-141"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 7 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group