BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The New York "bit players" we tend to ignore......
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 58, 59, 60
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2423
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2023 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
Thoughts...........

Take notice, that, after the War, the "Bee-oh-Tee", outside of the relatively few TWIN "Oddballs" that were purchased, chose to stick with "Gee-Em" and MACK.

Just as well that the "Bee-oh-Tee" did not invest in postwar WHITES, as production would cease in the early 1950's.

After MACK stepped out of the bus-building business in 1960's, the "Tee-Yay"had but two choices for new buses, "Gee-Em" and FLXIBLE.

By this late date, ACF-BRILL had long ceased building buses (not that the "Tee-Yay" would have been interested, anyway)

Strange, also, how "Slinkies" (artics) were beginning to catch on here by the 1980's; at one time, buses such as these were mostly found in European cities; today, they are quite commonplace here in the States (and elsewhere)........

"NYO"

["FLXIBLE"]

ACF also, at the start of the '60's, stopped making passenger railroad cars, their last in the NYC metro being the R-26 and R-28 subway cars for the "Eye-Are-Tee." Which were the first "married pair" cars for the system. It wasn't just their Brill subsidiary who'd thrown in the towel on future "Brill-boas." Their last "wide" subway cars were the 1955 order of R-16's; by the time R-27's, R-30's and R-30A's were drawn up for building, St. Louis Car (which I seem to recall back in the day built a few streetcars, some of the PCC variety, and maybe some trolleybuses along the way) got the order.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22669
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2023 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

Right on the mark.

For most of their "Black Car" fleet, the old "Aitch & Em" relied heavily on ACF (other cars were built by PRESSED STEEL)

ACF trolleybuses were built in the ACF plant at Philadelphia; the earliest were similar to the prewar vehicles, but carried the BRILL nameplate.

The "See-Tee-Yay" once rostered 120 ACF-BRILL trolleybuses ("T-44"); trolleybus operation ended in the early 1970's.

A number of Canadian operators favored "TC-44" CCF-BRILL trolleybuses.

Though postwar ACF-BRILL suburbans (C-44's) were commonplace here in "Joisey" through a good chunk of the 1960's, transit models were not to be found, despite the diverse fleets that operated in the Hudson County area, in my much younger days........

"NYO"

["17 NORTH-CLARK"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22669
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2023 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also wonder if the "Em-Tee-Yay", back in the 70's, ever showed even the slightest interest in the "AM GENERAL", examples of which operated in Queens?

By the 70's, GM was getting near to the end of domestic bus production, and FLXIBLE would also be soon relegated to history.

One also cannot help but wonder to picture the "Em-Tee-Yay"/"stoa") purchasing new "Dangerfields" instead of the "Gee-Em" T6H-5309A's, for the replacement of the "Toid Aven-uh" El up in "da Bronx"............

"NYO"

["4841"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
traildriver




Joined: 26 Mar 2011
Posts: 2460
Location: South Florida

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2023 6:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B. Fishbowl wrote:

ACF also, at the start of the '60's, stopped making passenger railroad cars,


Speaking of ACF...they happened to build some of the nicest railroad passenger cars...some of the "Domeliner's" for the Union Pacific "City" passenger trains, in the fifties...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2423
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2023 6:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
I also wonder if the "Em-Tee-Yay", back in the 70's, ever showed even the slightest interest in the "AM GENERAL", examples of which operated in Queens?

By the 70's, GM was getting near to the end of domestic bus production, and FLXIBLE would also be soon relegated to history.

One also cannot help but wonder to picture the "Em-Tee-Yay"/"stoa") purchasing new "Dangerfields" instead of the "Gee-Em" T6H-5309A's, for the replacement of the "Toid Aven-uh" El up in "da Bronx"............

"NYO"

["4841"]

By the time the "Em-Tee-Yay" got around to purchasing their slew of "Dangerfields" in the 1973-77 period (for both "Tee-Yay" and " 'stoa"), the Bx55 line that replaced the "Toid Avenyah" el in "da Bronx," in their minds, was apparently all fulfilled in terms of rolling stock - but notice, all Fishbowls, whether the new 5309A's or some of the 1965-66 non-batwing 5303's. (I still hold the 4860-4919 order of the 5309A's was as much a replacement for the last remaining FACL/ST Fishbowls still on the road; ever seen any of those oldies running on Bronx streets after, say, August 1973?)

Notice they did not buy from "Gee-Em" at all between the end of that whole custom 5309A/5310A set, and the point where the "Are-Tee-Ess" fleet had their back side straightened up, after the private companies (excepting, of course, the by-then defunct Avenue B & East Broadway entity) got the earlier sloped backsides.

But I doubt the "Em-Tee-Yay" even considered the AM General so much as a fly on the wall. If you study their history, their management seemed rather conservative in terms of from whom they ordered, their Leyland double-decker order notwithstanding. (They were certainly so with subway car trucks, which was why experimental - and considerably lighter - Pioneer III trucks that originally came with the last R-32's in 1965 were left to rust in the yards - at least, up to the whole Rockwell debacle viz the R-46.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22669
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2023 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

Interesting,in-depth "reporting", as usual. Wink

Yep, I do think that the "AM GENERAL" was a bit too "exotic" for the "Em-Tee-Yay"; recall, this was a number years before VOLVO and NEOPLAN equipment began to be seen in this country, so, the "Em-Tee-Yay" really had little choice when it came to buying new buses.

Too,so ironic that the "Bombers" literally BOMBED on the streets of "Noo Yawk", unlike their rugged "Dangerfield" counterparts.

Funny, though, even when you look at an RTS (even the early models built by "Gee-Em") you really don't think "Gee-Em" as you automatically did with a Fishbowl or a "Sherman".

Here again, as we have often discussed here, it is always interesting to imagine the "Em-Tee-Yay"purchasing the RTS right from the get-go, instead of investing in the ill-fated "Bombers".

Of course, by the time that the first "Bombers" were (literally) "hitting the streets", the hard-working "Dangerfields" were no longer in production.

Ironic, too, that, even though the "Em-Tee-Yay" first shunned the RTS, they ended up purchasing many hundreds, thus having them become the backbone of the fleet, just as the Fishbowls and "Shermans" were before them............

"NYO"

["M"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 58, 59, 60
Page 60 of 60

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group