BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The New York "bit players" we tend to ignore......
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 56, 57, 58, 59, 60  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2023 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

(see previous postings)
Interesting......

It's obvious that FACCo's horse-drawn, double-deck omnibuses were indeed inspired by those operating in London since the 1850's.

The original omnibuses in London featured "knife-board" seating on the top deck, with the passengers seated back-to-back, facing either side.

These seats were reached by two ladder-like stairways at the rear.

By the 1870's, the transition to forward-facing seating was well under way.

Many other European cities also utilized open-top omnibuses (and trams) prior to electric traction and motor buses......

See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_bus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FACCo musings..............

WHITES:

It always seemed a bit odd to me that FACCo ordered the six WHITE 1150-D-7's; in a fleet where "Shermans" overwhelmingly dominated, the C-50-DT "Pattons" were in the minority in the FACCo fleet, for certain,

Fishbowls:

FACL, as we know, only rostered 10 Fishbowls (TDH-5301's)

I've always been curious as to why FACL purchased only 10 (were there plans to purchase more before the '62 strike?)..........

"NYO"

["FACL"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2518
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
FACCo musings..............

WHITES:

It always seemed a bit odd to me that FACCo ordered the six WHITE 1150-D-7's; in a fleet where "Shermans" overwhelmingly dominated, the C-50-DT "Pattons" were in the minority in the FACCo fleet, for certain,

Fishbowls:

FACL, as we know, only rostered 10 Fishbowls (TDH-5301's)

I've always been curious as to why FACL purchased only 10 (were there plans to purchase more before the '62 strike?)..........

"NYO"

["FACL"]

FACL's purchase of Fishbowls was initially 20 - 10 A/C (1-10, renumbered 3211-3220 in 1963 by " 'stoa") and 10 non-A/C (3101-3110), in early 1960. Those were the last ordered and delivered in longtime president John E. McCarthy's lifetime. In late 1960, there were 50 buses marked 'FACL' (3111-3160) and another 50 marked 'Surface Transit' (3161-3210) for a grand total of 120 (of which 65 were FACL; A/C 6-10, originally FACL, were relettered for ST after their 50 Fishbowls came to the fore).

Of the Fishbowls, 1-5, 3101-3104 and 3111-3135 were for the FACO Division; and 6-10 (initially), 3105-3110 and 3136-3160 were allotted to the NYCO Division. On 3136-3160, it is known that 146th, 100th and 54th got them. 12th Street wouldn't get a Fishbowl in its broom-closet garage (they could only hold 63 or so buses inside and the rest had to be parked on the street where the elements could rust them out prematurely) until the last 74 from the first " 'stoa" order of 1963 (3482-3555) were transferred there in the late 1960's. From pics taken up and down Fifth Avenue in the 1960-62 period that have turned up on eBay, 132nd Street apparently received 3111-3125. No pics were snapped whenever a 15 Jackson Heights passed by Fifth - or if it did, it wasn't one of the ten Fishbowls between 3126 and 3135 that may have gone to the Jackson Heights depot.

But when FACCo ordered the 1150-D-7 Whites and C-50-DT "Pattons" was when the only "Shermans" in terms of new models were only 102" wide (the 96" wide TDH-5104's hadn't yet been drawn up by "Gee-Em" at that juncture). Natch', those sore thumbs (in terms of their sticking out alongside their "Sherman" counterparts) went to Jackson Heights to hold down the 15. This is why I say if FACL ordered "Dangerfields," they would have gone to there plus certain lesser areas of "da Bronx."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

As usual, appreciate your in-depth info; always learning something new! Wink

I, too, imagined, that, had "Dangerfields" had been purchased, they, most likely, would have gone to the less-prestigious routes up in "da Bronx", and, also, Queens.

While on the subject of buses "sticking out like sore thumbs" in a given fleet, recall the 15 ACF-BRILL C-44's ("BRILL-boas") which were ordered in 1947 by "QUEENS-NASSAU TRANSIT" (talk about "bit players"!)

Interestingly, this company resisted "Gee-Em" buses until the early 1950's.

These 15 "BRILL-boas" were the only ACF-BRILL buses to run on the streets of "Noo Yawk".

These unique buses operated until 1960, when they were replaced by 25 Fishbowls (TDH-5302's); "Shermans" did not arrive on the property until 1951, when 30 TDH-4509's were purchased.*

Recall, also, the "BRILL-boa" demo that the "Bee-oh-Tee" tested out on the First Avenue line in 1948.**

This C-48 model later became part of the CTA fleet; the CTA operated a large number of "BRILL-boas" well into the 1960's, including trolleybuses.

"NYO"

["107"]

*Source: "NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT BUSES"(Martin)

**Source: "NEW YORK CITY BUS & TROLLEY COACH FLEET" (Greller)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Further on the "less-than-a-handful" ACF-BRILL ("BRILL-boas") in "Noo Yawk............

Clearly (for whatever reason) the "Bee-oh-Tee" was not at all impressed with the "BRILL-boa".

Overwhelmingly, "Gee-Em" built buses were indeed the hands-down favorites, with the formidable "Pattons" (MACKS) in second place.

The "Oddballs" (postwar TWINS), were, at least, much greater in number than the "BRILL-boa" on "Noo Yawk" streets.

Here in "Joisey", the "BRILL-boas" I knew (C-44's) were suburban models (DE CAMP/INTER-CITY); oddly enough, despite the great variety of manufacturers represented by the old Hudson County "indy" companies which Your's Truly grew up with,, none rostered any ACF-BRILLS.

Baltimore's BTC, on the other hand, ran a sizeable number of "BRILL-boas" until the later 1960's.

The CTA, as I had mentioned earlier, rostered a large number of "BRILL-boas" well into the 1960's.............

"NYO"

["ACF-BRILL"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2518
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
The CTA, as I had mentioned earlier, rostered a large number of "BRILL-boas" well into the 1960's.............

I seem to remember the "See-Tee-Yay" had quite a few Twin "Oddballs" too, no?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B. Fishbowl wrote:
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
The CTA, as I had mentioned earlier, rostered a large number of "BRILL-boas" well into the 1960's.............

I seem to remember the "See-Tee-Yay" had quite a few Twin "Oddballs" too, no?


W.B;

You hit the nail right on the head, my friend! Wink

The "Cee-Tee-Yay", as you know, was VERY loyal to both TWIN and FLXIBLE.

By the early 50's, the "See-Tee-Yay" had at least 1,000 "Oddballs" in their fleet.

Remember, also, Chicago saw its first of many hundreds of "Dangerfields" arriving in 1961, 150 in all.

At the same time, the "See-Tee-Yay" purchased a like number of Fishbowls (TDH-5310s), for a side-by-side comparison*

These buses are all assigned to several operating divisions, for comparisons.

The "See-Tee-Yay" continued to favor "Dangerfields" until the summer of 1972, when a large order of T8H-5307A's arrived, followed by even more large orders in 1974 and 1976..............

*(Imagine, now, had the "Tee-Yay" also split an order between "Gee-Em" and FLXIBLE, for a side-by-side comparison of Fishbowls and "Dangerfields", early in the 1960's?)

"NYO"

["CTA"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2518
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
*(Imagine, now, had the "Tee-Yay" also split an order between "Gee-Em" and FLXIBLE, for a side-by-side comparison of Fishbowls and "Dangerfields", early in the 1960's?)

Though it could be argued that there was indeed a split in 1964 and 1965 between Flxible and "Gee-Em" - not within the "Tee-Yay," but them with the former and " 'stoa" on the latter. Natch', as OA had some of the oldest buses out there - all inherited from FACCo, NYCO and Surface - the newest buses in both orders were higher in number (325 in 1964, 500 in 1965) than the "Dangerfields" the "Tee-Yay" did order (165 in 1964, 190 in 1965). Alas, as none of the 355 "Dangerfields" saw Manhattan service except in passing (i.e. when assigned to B15 over the Manhattan Bridge a.k.a. "Manny B" or B39 over the Williamsburg or "Willy B"), there was no opportunity to compare and contrast side-by-side with " 'stoa's" Fishbowls that entered all but one Manhattan depot on the '64 order, and all depots except that one on the '65 order.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

Look at PSNJ: here was a die hard YELLOW customer, and they, postwar, pledged total loyalty to "Gee-Em" into the early 1970's (well, ALMOST total loyalty; in 1948, PSNJ did, in fact, take delivery of a small number of "BRILL-boa" C-44's suburbans, which, after only several years in service, were sold to DE CAMP)

Then, too, there was the lone postwar MACK suburban demo.

Aside from these few "strays", PS was a loyal and steadfast "Gee-Em" customer; the very first "Dangerfields" (both transit and suburban) did not arrive on TNJ turf until 1977/1976, when nearly 1,000 were delivered, New Jersey's largest bus order to date.

The far-flung "See-Tee-Yay", it must be remembered, well into the 1960's, also rostered a large (and diverse) fleet of buses inherited from both CSL and CMCCo, which included "Shermans", "Pattons", "BRILL-boas", WHITES, and prewar "slant back" TWINS (this does not include the trolleybus fleet, which lasted into the early 1970's)............

"NYO"

["57 LARAMIE"]


Last edited by NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 on Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:24 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Speaking of true "Noo Yawk"-area ""oddballs"/"misfits")

Recall the two REO 96-HDT's rostered by "NORTH SHORE BUS COMPANY",being delivered about 1945; only two of these early postwar buses were operated by the company.

Both of these "orphans" would be retired by 1951.

Your's Truly was familiar with the type, however; in the early 1960's, Jersey City-"indies" "LAFAYETTE & GREENVILLE" and "BERGEN AVENUE" both rostered several.

These were indeed buses that "stood out" in a crowd..........

"NYO"

["BERGEN AVENUE LOCAL"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WHITES..........

These tough-looking buses were once commonplace in many US cities, into the 1960's, and, in a few places, the early 1970's; a number of the "indy" Hudson County-areacompanies I knew 60-odd years ago operated them, in both transit and suburban versions.

The short-lived "ISLE TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION" of Staten Island rostered 35 of the type; they later operated, for a time, in the "Bee-oh-Tee" fleet.

Needless to say, the "Bee-oh-Tee"had no interested in WHITES.........

"NYO"

["6 ST. GEORGE FERRY"]


Last edited by NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 on Tue Oct 24, 2023 6:27 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TRIBORO once rostered at least some WHITES..........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?154324

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2518
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2023 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And NYCO had exactly one White in its entire bus roster, holding the 17 - 79th Street Crosstown route.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B. Fishbowl wrote:
And NYCO had exactly one White in its entire bus roster, holding the 17 - 79th Street Crosstown route.


W.B.:

Here again, one wonders why certain makes of buses were more popular and commonplace in some cities, and not to be seen in others (or, if seen at all, in small numbers)

As an example,look at how uncommon the postwar TWIN COACHES (aka "Oddballs") were in the "Noo Yawk" area (PSNJ never even had a single demo!)

None of the NJ "indy" companies I knew ever had them, despite the great variety of buses in their fleets, through a good chunk of the 1960's.

On the other hand, look at how "Oddballs" dominated certain fleets, such as the "See-Tee-Yay" and MUNI.

From what I have read, the "See-Tee-Yay" and MUNI had the largest fleets of "Oddballs" in the country (Chicago's 1,000-odd TWINS were all propane powered)

In many cities, the "Oddballs" were in the minority in a number of fleets, fleets that were largely dominated by "Gee-Em" and other makes.

Interestingly, TWIN's largest postwar trolleybuses order went to MUNI.

'Frisco", it should be noted, was indeed NOT a "Gee-Em"-dominated city; into the early 70's, "Pattons" and "Oddballs" were the norm, along with a number of WHITE 798's............

"NYO"

["TWIN"]


Last edited by NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 on Wed Oct 25, 2023 10:12 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 23080
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2023 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MUNI diversity (no shortage of variety here, back in the day!) Wink

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?156919

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?56538

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?156910

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?156929

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["30 STOCKTON"]


Last edited by NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 on Wed Oct 25, 2023 10:09 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 56, 57, 58, 59, 60  Next
Page 57 of 60

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group